---

Posted by Jeffery Belle on August 09, 2004 at 17:26:45:

In Reply to: Re: Third Week Slump posted by Carl Plaskett on September 07, 2001 at 18:16:02:

tramadol HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 3

proof by obfuscation:
A long plotless sequence of true and/or meaningless
syntactically related statements.

proof by wishful citation:
The author cites the negation, converse, or generalization of
a theorem from the literature to support his claims.

proof by funding:
How could three different government agencies be wrong?

proof by eminent authority:
'I saw Karp in the elevator and he said it was probably NP-
complete.'

• tramadol

Follow Ups:

---

Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: 

 

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ MAZE Alumni Forum ]

WWWBoard 2.0a and WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997, All Rights Reserved.
Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company